Indeed, it is them, the personnel employed in the health services, who wage the superhuman fight to maintain life at all costs, every day, in the face of the meteoric development of the epidemic, and without the means to fight the virus effectively. It is them too who went on strike for months against the degradation of their working conditions and to show that the public services, and the hospitals in particular, could no longer cope, following the drastic cuts in financial and human resources that the successive governments had imposed over the years.

Emmanuel Macron also said: “… What this pandemic shows is that in our Welfare State, health care [for all] regardless of income, history or profession are not costs or charges. These are precious assets which must be placed beyond the laws of the market. Deep down, it is madness to contract out to others the care of our food, our protection, our ability to heal and our living environment. We must regain control of it all. We must build even more than we do, a sovereign France and Europe, a France and a Europe which hold their destiny firmly in hand. The coming weeks and months are going to need ground-breaking decisions in this area. I will assume them …”

Do not read in these words that this government’s aim are going to change radically, or that the public hospital is going to finally receive the funding that it needs; or that our social security system will stay untouched by the reforms, like the pensions system, now put on hold for the time being. For more than twenty years now, liberal policies have contributed to destroying the capacity of our public services. Austerity measures and unpopular reforms against workers and pensioners have been pushed through, while the wealthy and the private businesses have been favoured, deepening the social inequalities. To verify this in the current chaos, enough to see the de-structuring of the health services and the shortages there – the lack of masks, screening tests, reanimation respirators, beds, equipment and personnel. This starvation of resources is replicated at the level of medical research where, to find funding, the researchers must present projects or call for donations in this sector so vital to public health.

France lutte défense HP

Health Workers in France

The way this coronavirus pandemic strikes ruthlessly in every country demonstrates the scale of the breakdown and incapacity of this [social] system to confront the situation: the cruel lack of anticipation, the evolution and geographical expansion of the virus and the absence of a public health plan to counter it. As the French government announces new measures every day, and places orders for masks and screening tests that take time to arrive, it is like piloting by sight.

In his speech, E. Macron never once mentioned the need for containment to prevent the virus from spreading. He even showed himself lounging leisurely outside. The education minister said on the same day that there was no reason to close the schools. Insufficiently aware of the danger, people lowered their guard and took advantage of a sunny weekend to stroll about and picnic in the parks. The following Sunday, the polling stations opened for the first round of the municipal elections, showing at first sight a certain normalcy. The next day, the announcement for general confinement descended, with a moralising speech from the government relayed by the media, against these people who continue to live normally, supposedly unconscious, unruly, individualistic, not in solidarity.

But whose fault? Our rulers told us everything and its opposite: “Stay at home” was hammered at all hours ‘to avoid spreading the contagion’ but also with the advice to “go to work” if you cannot work from home (without any protection) – whilst factories and companies were closing one after the other or announcing lay-offs. Incentives were created to induce people to go to work, like the tax-free bonuses! [1] Stuck in their consumerist and productivist logic, it took time for our rulers to realise that economic activity had to stop if lives were going to be saved.

As of March 16, Emmanuel Macron donned his warlord costume. He then appeared on television to pronounce repeatedly: “We are at war”- and to call for national unity to give himself full powers. In a few days flat, he got the Health Emergency Law [2] passed on March 23, which institutes a kind of intermediate between a State of Emergency and the Emergency Regime. With much hammering of orders and decrees to restrict circulation and freedoms without any control from parliament – itself also confined. And without any means to assess the merits of these measures from the constitutional point of view. Even if the situation demanded drastic measures, one can legitimately wonder about their duration, particularly in light of the experience France made after the terrorist attacks when the temporary State of Emergency became perennial!

The Health Emergency Law represents therefore one more attack on freedom and democracy. Its implementation is accompanied by drones and helicopters to check that the population stays really confined at home, duly supplied with mandatory exemption certificates under the threat of fines and 6 months in jail. All this in a context where the virus threat has now reached the prisons. There, overcrowding and the promiscuity of prisoners has led to talk of the need to release some of them. Police and gendarmerie are mobilised to maintain the order of confinement and punish offenders. Hundreds of thousands of penalty tickets have already been issued across the country.

The 43 Ordinances of this Health Law themselves carry the economic and social measures of a very great retreat in the working conditions. Up to now, no-one ever dared to go this far, not even during the hectic reforms of the Code of Labour (2016). According to the three Covid-19 Ordinances on Working Time, employers can derogate from the legal rules. They can require employees to take 6 days of their paid holidays at any time, change or decide the dates of the employee’s statutory paid holidays, split them up, revoke the existing working hours arrangements, and the rest days. It is now possible for the employers to increase the hours of the working day in the sectors deemed “essential to the safeguard of economic life” and “to the security of the Nation”. The working day will pass from 10h to 12 (day or night), and the working week from 48h to 60. These measures are to kick-in on 31 December 2020 — well beyond the confinement period projected for the time being! No more concerted actions, no more social dialogue, no more collective bargaining. And above all for the employers, a lid lifted on the restriction called  “respect for the workers’ rights”.

But these employees essential to economic life are also those who earn the least and get the harshest jobs: garbage collectors, cleaning women, nurses, cashiers, carers in retirement homes … It is them who get in the face the full force of the social inequalities. Once the crisis abates, it is them too who will shoulder the costs of what the government hands over to ailing enterprises and part-frozen shareholders’ dividends. Do not look for equitable distribution and social justice at the end of the confinement. Be in no doubt that austerity will still be there. Proof is the call for donations launched by several foundations to help the public hospital and its carers, the latter strongly protesting on account that the public hospital should be in receipt of specific funding, as is done to business. At the Mulhouse hospital, very hard hit by the virus, Emmanuel Macron announced “the coming of a massive investment and upgrading plan for all working careers”. But the Senate contradicts this because, if ongoing bargaining is anything to go by, this privatises the public health services more than it strengthens them.


Hospital personnel repudiate their pay and conditions 
in a 21st Century France deemed to be the 6th economic power in the world. 
What a shame! they say. March 2020

Prepare now for the coming day

The Health Emergency Law, the public freedom restrictions, and the repressive and regressive measures now coming in, cannot make us forget the struggles which have been shaking the country for months against the Pensions reform. This situation of containment and the stopping of the economic machine show the need to review entirely all the policies at all levels.

We can see in the management of this crisis the glaring lack of any economic plan to meet the immediate needs of people. The big French industries are at a standstill and could use their capabilities to produce the equipment needed in the hospitals. This is the case of automotive companies like Renault and PSA who have just asked their engineering teams to study the production of respirators for bedside resuscitation. Other companies have started making masks to help alleviate the shortage. These are examples of what can be done to try to contain the epidemic as quickly as possible, but the government has not yet imposed the conversion of production on all French industries, this being left to the goodwill of manufacturers only. There is also a need to relocate certain large companies in order to regain production autonomy, particularly in the drugs sector, which are currently imported from Asia.

The current crisis has shown that the capitalist world cannot act in the same way and under the same conditions as before. The revival of the economy, once the crisis has been overcome, should not mean the continuation of production and consumption standards according to the laws of the market. Social and ecological emergencies will require enormous efforts to transform the industry and investments that these laws cannot respond to. Jobs will have to be created to meet the needs for renewable energy, the development of public and local services and medical research. The whole agricultural policy will have to be reviewed also, to make it meet the needs of local requirement with healthy food for all, halting all urban projects which monopolise arable land.

The confinement stunned people during the first few days, but solidarity was soon organised to come to the aid of the most deprived, the forgotten who are the homeless, the undocumented, the refugees in the retention camps. Solidarity reorganized the distribution of food aid and support for the elderly. Many initiatives have been developed all over France to maintain social relations through networks and the internet, interventions on balconies and windows to support our care-givers, and also to vent undiminished angers with the use of placards and videos. Initiatives were developed to spread ideas and keep the kids occupied at home. Despite the difficulties, many associations manage to maintain their social, economic and cultural activities, their collective practices. They have created new ways of talking, of sharing the taste for reading with everyone, of bringing shows and exhibitions in the homes, demonstrating their capacity for adaptation and organisation.

This situation is a great opportunity for the left and the actors of progress to create a new balance of power favourable to the evolution of society towards more social justice, more humanity, more ecology. This is how unions and associations united to say that it is no longer possible to return to the normality based on productivism, consumerism, competition, inequality. We must grasp this situation of confinement to thoroughly review the foundations of our society, so that people can regain control and prepare collective responses with solidarity, mutual aid, the development of public services, the defence of the rights of employees. Let us prepare now for the coming day.

The Posadists – March 30, 2020

[1] On 20th March 2020 and despite the policy of confinement against the virus, France’s minister of the economy Bruno Le Maire called on companies to offer a tax-free-bonus of 1,000 Euros to all employees who decide to go to work. 

[2] The Journal des Femmes Santé analyses that this law is now lending a legal base to confinement.

Author Description

Recent Posts

VENEZUELA: FROM THE CONDOR PLAN TO THE “PARROT PLAN”: the right-wing has its candidate to confront Nicolas Maduro – We reproduce below an article published in Venezuela Infos explaining how the right and the extreme right are seeking to beat Nicolas Maduro by every means in the next presidential elections. They have enlisted a puppet candidate that no one knows, proof of the feebleness of the bourgeoisie in front of the development of the revolutionary process in the country.

Comments are closed.